Author summary
8%2 analyzed articles/videos1,115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mountain Journal results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 442 hits. Analysis detected 1,639 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,656 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (8,107 of 8,264 authors). This Mountain Journal is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group.
Mountain Journal
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Jared Counts1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
2%Mountain Journal (selected)1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,656
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

2% percentile
02550751001.9% percentile
0.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Middle Ground: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos