Author summary
10%1 analyzed article/video1,115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark DeGraff results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 338 hits. Analysis detected 1,216 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 11% (7,381 of 8,294 authors). This Mark DeGraff is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Mark DeGraff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
0%Cleveland Documenters1%
11%Mark DeGraff (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,460
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

11% percentile
025507510011.0% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.3%3.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Middle Ground: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos