Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nick Mott results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 2.5% saturation with 104 hits . Analysis detected 423 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 8,266 authors). This Nick Mott is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Nick Mott
Author details
Total words: 4,196
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst