Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lisa Ryan results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 330 hits . Analysis detected 1,962 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,423 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,712 of 6,202 authors). This Lisa Ryan is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group. Lisa Ryan
Author details
Total words: 3,423
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.3% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 7.7% 7.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.6% 9.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst