Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,401 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Estelle Timar-Wilcox results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 1,651 hits . Analysis detected 8,958 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,203 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,553 of 6,163 authors). This Estelle Timar-Wilcox is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. Estelle Timar-Wilcox
Author details
Total words: 7,203
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.8% percentile 4.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 17.6% 17.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 22.9% 22.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 22.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Author 17.6%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.0%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 15.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst