Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,980 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cari Spencer results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 1,143 hits . Analysis detected 6,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,940 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,881 of 6,218 authors). This Cari Spencer is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. Cari Spencer
Author details
Total words: 5,940
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.8% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.9% 10.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.2% 19.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.5% 11.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.9% 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.8%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst