Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,649 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erica Zurek results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 703 hits. Analysis detected 4,896 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,947 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,808 of 6,628 authors). This Erica Zurek is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Erica Zurek
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
73%Erica Zurek (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,947
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

73% percentile
025507510072.7% percentile
3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.1%7.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.2%14.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 13.4%13.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.4%2.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 13.4%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos