Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,649 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erica Zurek results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 703 hits . Analysis detected 4,896 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,947 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,808 of 6,628 authors). This Erica Zurek is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group. Erica Zurek
Author details
Total words: 4,947
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.7% percentile 3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.2% 14.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 13.4% 13.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 13.4%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Composition/Division: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst