Author summary
66% 1 analyzed article/video 847 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Riddle results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Indoctrination , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 576 hits . Analysis detected 2,992 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,640 of 8,944 authors). This John Riddle is worse (more manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group. John Riddle
Author details
Total words: 3,388
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.7% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 17.0% 17.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 14.5% 14.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 17.0%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 14.5%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% No True Scotsman: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst