Publication summary
56% 17 analyzed articles/videos 14,128 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Delaware Live results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 3,098 hits . Analysis detected 34,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 56,790 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 39% (347 of 563 publications). This Delaware Live is better (less manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 56,790
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.4% percentile 1.3% BS Score17 analyzed articles56.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst