Author summary
29% 2 analyzed articles/videos 709 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jane Park results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 220 hits . Analysis detected 1,541 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,127 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,971 of 6,581 authors). This Jane Park is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group. Jane Park
Author details
Total words: 2,127
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst