Author summary
53% 1 analyzed article/video 372 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Quinlan Bentley results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 140 hits . Analysis detected 1,179 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,090 of 6,455 authors). This Quinlan Bentley is worse (more manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group. Quinlan Bentley
Author details
Total words: 1,116
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.1% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.5% 12.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.5% 9.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.1% 9.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 7.3% 7.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 7.3% 7.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.0%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst