Man sentenced for sexually assaulting girl who used 'Lion's Roar' 10%

By Jane Park30%

7/23/2026, 8:51:40 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 270 faulty-reasoning hits from 337 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.7% and a BS Rank of 10% (19,794 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.40% of the article peer group.

A repeat sex offender is set to spend decades in prison after sexually assaulting a 6-year-old girl who used a "Lion's Roar" technique to fend him off earlier this year. 
Robert DeWeese, 37, pleaded guilty to rape, gross sexual imposition, kidnapping and abduction on July 23 in Warren County Common Pleas Court, according to a prosecutor's office news release. 
Judge Robert Peeler sentenced him to 30 to 35½ years in prison. 
The Feb. 6 incident occurred at a Five Below store in South Lebanon. 
Her mother, who was getting her daughter a change of clothes, instructed her daughter not to open the door to the restroom unless she heard a special knock signal. 
DeWeese, who overheard this conversation, waited until the mother had left before simulating the particular knock and sexually assaulting the girl in the bathroom. 
Using a technique she learned in scouting called the "Lion's Roar," the girl shouted “Stop!” 
as loud as she could, which startled the attacker and caused him to flee. 
Warren County sheriff's deputies later located DeWeese at a relative's house nearby and arrested him. 
"This little girl showed quick thinking when she used ‘The Lions Roar’ to stop this sexual assault,” Warren County Prosecutor David Fornshell said in the release. 
DeWeese had a prior conviction for gross sexual imposition in Fairfield County, Ohio. 
According to court documents, he touched an 11-year-old girl while waiting in line at a Lancaster Dollar Tree in 2021. 
He was initially sentenced to five years probation and ordered to participate in treatment. 
Court documents state he repeatedly failed to complete the treatment and was sentenced to three years in prison. 
Based on his sentence, he was likely released in mid-2024. 
DeWeese also has convictions from 2019 in Licking County for public indecency and voyeurism. 
He is currently held at Warren County Jail as of the afternoon of July 23. 
The Enquirer reached out to DeWeese's attorney for comment but did not receive an immediate response. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Jane Park: 3.0%The Enquirer: 2.8%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Jane Park: 4.5%The Enquirer: 1.9%Anchoring Bias3.9%This article: 8.6%Jane Park: 5.2%The Enquirer: 2.9%Availability Heuristic8.6%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 1.1%The Enquirer: 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.5%The Enquirer: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Jane Park: 0.5%The Enquirer: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias3.0%This article: 8.9%Jane Park: 5.0%The Enquirer: 3.3%Framing Effect8.9%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.9%The Enquirer: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.8%The Enquirer: 1.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Jane Park: 0.9%The Enquirer: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect4.2%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 14.8%Jane Park: 10.3%The Enquirer: 7.7%Negativity Bias14.8%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.8%The Enquirer: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Jane Park: 2.2%The Enquirer: 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error7.1%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Jane Park: 1.2%The Enquirer: 4.1%Halo Effect7.7%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Jane Park: 0.8%The Enquirer: 0.2%Primacy Effect4.7%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 1.8%The Enquirer: 2.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 4.6%The Enquirer: 3.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 6.2%The Enquirer: 3.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.3%Jane Park: 2.7%The Enquirer: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.3%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.9%The Enquirer: 1.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 3.9%The Enquirer: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.4%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.7%Jane Park: 2.5%The Enquirer: 1.3%Unattributed Quote7.7%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 1.2%The Enquirer: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.2%Jane Park: 5.4%The Enquirer: 2.1%Biased Writer Voice4.2%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 1.8%The Enquirer: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jane Park: 3.7%The Enquirer: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

337 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker7.7%attributed speech311writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWarren County Prosecutor David Fornshell • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
26 attributed words100% of attributed speech57% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Warren County Prosecutor David Fornshell: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.5 ptsWriter: 4.5%Warren County Prosecutor David Fornshell: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.