Author summary
14% 1 analyzed article/video 225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hamilton Matthew Masters results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , In-Group Bias , and Fundamental Attribution Error , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 54 hits . Analysis detected 489 faulty-reasoning hits from 900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (2,565 of 9,299 authors). This Hamilton Matthew Masters is worse (more manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group. Hamilton Matthew Masters
Author details
Total words: 900
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.4% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles900 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 3.4% 3.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst