Scenes From Primary Election Night 17%

By Ray Di Pietro14% Eric England14% Hamilton Matthew Masters14%

8/7/2026, 1:50:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Anecdotal, and Unattributed Quote, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 49 hits. Analysis detected 363 faulty-reasoning hits from 225 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 24.9% and a BS Rank of 17% (25,338 of 30,211 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the article peer group.

Aug. 6’s state and federal primary elections in Tennessee saw relatively few big surprises, with one notable exception  former state Agriculture Commissioner Charlie Hatcher beating incumbent U.S. 
Rep. 
Andy Ogles to become the Republican candidate in Tennessee’s 5th Congressional District. 
“So apparently, ‘Hire a farmer’ resonated with the constituents of the 5th District,” Hatcher said to supporters at his election night event in Franklin at Leiper’s Fork Distillery’s House of Spirits. 
Meanwhile in Knoxville, U.S. 
Sen. 
Marsha Blackburn celebrated her Republican gubernatorial primary win over second-place finisher U.S. 
Rep. 
John Rose by talking about Democrats. 
“They are running to destroy our state and nation,” Blackburn told supporters gathered at the Knoxville Convention Center. 
In November’s general election, Blackburn will take on Nashville City Councilmember Jerri Green, who handily defeated a crowded field in the Democratic primary, while Hatcher will take on his Democratic challenger, Columbia Mayor Chaz Molder, in the 5th Congressional District primary. 
For more coverage of Thursday’s primary results  including the results of Nashville’s congressional district primaries and state House and Senate primaries  visit this link. 
Above, find photos from Blackburn’s, Rose’s and Hatcher’s election night parties from photographers Hamilton Matthew Masters, Ray Di Pietro and Eric England. 
And stay tuned between now and Election Day for much more coverage.  D. 
PATRICK RODGERS, EDITOR-IN-CHIEF 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 1.3%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 2.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 12.4%Ray Di Pietro: 3.1%Nashville Scene: 0.6%Hindsight Bias12.4%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 3.2%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 12.4%Ray Di Pietro: 3.1%Nashville Scene: 0.4%Status Quo Bias12.4%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.2%Ray Di Pietro: 1.6%Nashville Scene: 2.2%Optimism Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Ray Di Pietro: 6.0%Nashville Scene: 3.4%Negativity Bias8.0%This article: 5.3%Ray Di Pietro: 1.3%Nashville Scene: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias5.3%This article: 18.2%Ray Di Pietro: 4.6%Nashville Scene: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error18.2%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 21.8%Ray Di Pietro: 5.4%Nashville Scene: 0.4%In-Group Bias21.8%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 2.0%Nashville Scene: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 3.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 2.0%Nashville Scene: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 1.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 8.0%Ray Di Pietro: 2.0%Nashville Scene: 0.6%False Dilemma8.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 2.0%Nashville Scene: 3.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.0%Ray Di Pietro: 6.0%Nashville Scene: 2.2%Appeal to Emotion8.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 13.8%Ray Di Pietro: 3.4%Nashville Scene: 1.5%Anecdotal13.8%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.8%Ray Di Pietro: 3.4%Nashville Scene: 0.4%Unattributed Quote13.8%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 13.8%Ray Di Pietro: 3.4%Nashville Scene: 6.3%Biased Writer Voice13.8%This article: 8.0%Ray Di Pietro: 2.0%Nashville Scene: 0.4%Indoctrination8.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ray Di Pietro: 0.0%Nashville Scene: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 11.6%Ray Di Pietro: 2.9%Nashville Scene: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…11.6%

225 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers27%attributed speech164writer words
Selected voice

Charlie Hatcher

100%flagged-word coverage
31 attributed words51% of attributed speech66% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Charlie Hatcher: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Charlie Hatcher: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -15.9 ptsWriter: 15.9%Charlie Hatcher: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.