Keyword summary
⁠21%3 analyzed articles/videos922 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Races results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 470 hits. Analysis detected 3,817 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,173 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (36,553 of 37,536 keywords). This Congressional Races is better (less manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group.
Congressional Races
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠3%Congressional Races (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

3% percentile
02550751002.6% percentile
1.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos