Dollars flowing into a pair of hotly contested WA congressional races 6%

By Jerry Cornfield0% Washington State Standard0%

4/17/2026, 9:09:26 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 854 faulty-reasoning hits from 814 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 21.3% and a BS Rank of 6% (20,726 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the article peer group.

An early fundraising leader has emerged from the crowd of candidates battling to succeed retiring Republican Congressman Dan Newhouse in central Washington. 
Republican Amanda McKinney, a Yakima County commissioner, hauled in $523,892 through the end of March, far outpacing the other seven people vying for the reliably GOP seat in the 4th Congressional District. 
Meanwhile, in a closely watched congressional race in southwest Washington, Democratic U.S. 
Rep. 
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez raised $1.3 million in the first quarter of 2026, more than three times the amount collected by the leading Republican challenger, John Braun, per the latest filings with the Federal Election Commission. 
RELATED: Trump backs Braun to unseat WA’s Gluesenkamp Perez in US House race 
Congressional candidate fundraising totals for the first three months of this year were due Wednesday. 
The next reports, covering April 1 to June 30, will be posted in mid-July. 
In the 4th District, McKinney, one of four Republican candidates, reported $451,000 on hand as of March 31, according to Federal Election Commission records. 
She called the financial support “deeply humbling.” 
“This is what momentum looks like,” said McKinney, who is endorsed by President Donald Trump. 
“While others are still trying to figure out their campaigns, we are building a movement.” 
RELATED: WA GOP Horoscope: Trump rising, Dan Newhouse in retrograde 
Those others include Republicans Jerrod Sessler of Prosser, who is making his third consecutive bid for the seat and also claims Trump’s backing, Matt Boehnke of Kennewick, a state senator, and John Hughs of Lind. 
Boehnke, who entered the race in January, raised roughly $58,000 and had about $40,000 as of April 1. 
The reporting period coincided with the state legislative session. 
Sessler’s first-quarter report was not online Thursday. 
Prior filings show that he ended 2025 with just over $96,000 in his campaign account. 
Hughs reported $1,300 in contributions. 
John Duresky, the lone Democratic candidate, raised nearly $64,000 and had two-thirds of that sum available on April 1. 
“We’re well positioned for the fight ahead,” said Duresky, who is trying to become the first Democrat since 1992 to win the U.S. 
House seat. 
Former Gov. 
Jay Inslee won it that year but lost reelection after one term to Doc Hastings, a Republican, who served until retiring in 2015. 
Newhouse succeeded Hastings. 
As of Thursday, filings for Devin Poore and Favian Valencia, who are running as independents, were not online. 
Carmen Black became the eighth candidate earlier this month and is running as an independent. 
Washington’s 4th District stretches through the middle of the state from the Canadian border to Oregon. 
It includes the agriculture-heavy Yakima Valley, the Yakama Indian Reservation, and the Tri-Cities. 
Washington’s battleground 
Gluesenkamp Perez is seeking a third term representing the 3rd Congressional District that encompasses Clark, Cowlitz, Lewis, Pacific, Wahkiakum, and Skamania counties and a small part of Thurston County. 
In 2022, then a political novice, she stunned the political world by beating Republican Joe Kent, a Trump-backed right-wing spinner of conspiracy theories. 
Kent had defeated then-Congresswoman Jaime Herrera Beutler, a moderate Republican, in that year’s primary. 
Herrera Beutler had represented the district since 2011. 
RELATED: A big threat to Democrats' WA swing district 
Regaining the seat has been a GOP priority as it is viewed as pivotal to determining which party controls the U.S. 
House. 
Gluesenkamp Perez, with her latest fundraising, had nearly $3.5 million on hand at the end of the first quarter. 
In the latest period, she received funds from individual contributors and a variety of political committees. 
RELATED: 'You don't have to fight me on this,' says Gluesenkamp Perez on being booed by her own party 
Her donors run the gamut from entertainer Barbra Streisand to Sierra Pacific Industries chief executive Mark Emmerson. 
Braun, the state Senate minority leader who received Trump’s endorsement on Tuesday, hauled in $356,000. 
Combined with his earlier fundraising and spending, he reported just under $1 million on hand at the end of March. 
RELATED: Democratic Rep. 
Gluesenkamp Perez won in a Trump district. 
Now she faces an uprising from the left 
Thus far, the bulk of his money is from individual contributors. 
Among them are Newhouse, McKinney, and Brian Heywood, founder and leader of the conservative political committee Let’s Go Washington. 
Meanwhile, Brent Hennrich, a progressive Democrat running to the left of Gluesenkamp Perez, raised nearly $100,000, pushing his total for the election cycle to $167,000. 
He had just under $40,000 on hand on April 1. 
Antony Barran, who entered the race as a Republican and is now running on the Cascade Party ticket, reported less than $2,000 in contributions this cycle. 
Combined with early fundraising, he had around $5,000 on hand. 
Reports for three other candidates  Republicans Wadi Yakhour and Lawrence Kellogg and independent Suzzanna Tanner  were not online as of Thursday. 
This story was originally published by the Washington State Standard. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.8%Jerry Cornfield: 2.2%KUOW: 2.6%Confirmation Bias2.8%This article: 10.6%Jerry Cornfield: 1.1%KUOW: 1.3%Anchoring Bias10.6%This article: 2.7%Jerry Cornfield: 1.4%KUOW: 3.4%Availability Heuristic2.7%This article: 8.4%Jerry Cornfield: 0.9%KUOW: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic8.4%This article: 2.8%Jerry Cornfield: 0.5%KUOW: 0.7%Hindsight Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.7%KUOW: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Jerry Cornfield: 5.7%KUOW: 7.4%Framing Effect6.3%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 1.3%KUOW: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.8%KUOW: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.8%Jerry Cornfield: 1.5%KUOW: 3.8%Optimism Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 1.7%KUOW: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Jerry Cornfield: 8.9%KUOW: 8.0%Negativity Bias4.1%This article: 1.8%Jerry Cornfield: 2.2%KUOW: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.9%KUOW: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 1.8%KUOW: 2.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.5%KUOW: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.9%Jerry Cornfield: 2.3%KUOW: 2.7%Halo Effect10.9%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.8%Jerry Cornfield: 1.3%KUOW: 1.1%Recency Bias6.8%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.1%KUOW: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Jerry Cornfield: 1.4%KUOW: 0.5%Ad Hominem2.8%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.4%KUOW: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.7%Jerry Cornfield: 3.6%KUOW: 4.3%Appeal to Authority4.7%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 1.1%KUOW: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 1.2%KUOW: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.8%Jerry Cornfield: 1.5%KUOW: 4.1%Hasty Generalization2.8%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.0%KUOW: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.2%KUOW: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.7%Jerry Cornfield: 4.4%KUOW: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion2.7%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 1.1%KUOW: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 1.3%KUOW: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.2%KUOW: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.2%KUOW: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.1%Jerry Cornfield: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Composition/Division2.1%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.5%KUOW: 3.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.6%Jerry Cornfield: 0.7%KUOW: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.6%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.3%KUOW: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.3%Jerry Cornfield: 2.2%KUOW: 1.0%Unattributed Quote4.3%This article: 4.2%Jerry Cornfield: 2.5%KUOW: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection4.2%This article: 5.2%Jerry Cornfield: 2.4%KUOW: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice5.2%This article: 0.9%Jerry Cornfield: 0.2%KUOW: 1.5%Indoctrination0.9%This article: 8.5%Jerry Cornfield: 0.8%KUOW: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%Jerry Cornfield: 0.3%KUOW: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Jerry Cornfield: 0.2%KUOW: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.3%

814 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers7.4%attributed speech754writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda McKinney • 7 words • 100.0% coverageAmanda McKinney • 15 words • 100.0% coverageAmanda McKinney • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Duresky • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Amanda McKinney

100%flagged-word coverage
37 attributed words62% of attributed speech51% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Quote-first Misdirection+38.0 ptsWriter: 2.5%Amanda McKinney: 40.5%40.5%Indoctrination+18.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Amanda McKinney: 18.9%18.9%Politically Left Leaning B-9.2 ptsWriter: 9.2%Amanda McKinney: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-5.6 ptsWriter: 5.6%Amanda McKinney: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-4.6 ptsWriter: 4.6%Amanda McKinney: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.6 ptsWriter: 4.6%Amanda McKinney: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.