Author summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 317 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Lipstein results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 239 hits . Analysis detected 1,151 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,268 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 86% (1,323 of 9,116 authors). This Emily Lipstein is worse (more manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group. Emily Lipstein
Author details
Total words: 1,268
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.5% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 18.9% 18.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.8% 3.8% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 4.4% 4.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 18.9%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst