Breaking: Drivers Crash In Brooklyn, Injuring Three People Standing On A Sidewalk 66%

By Emily Lipstein85%

8/2/2026, 7:52:11 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 25.9% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 480 faulty-reasoning hits from 317 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.8% and a BS Rank of 66% (10,139 of 29,143 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the article peer group.

Two drivers collided in central Brooklyn on Sunday night, and one of the drivers ended up smashing into a building, striking and injuring members of a family that had been standing on a sidewalk. 
Only preliminary information was available about the 9:10 p.m. crash at the corner of Park and Nostrand avenues on the border of South Williamsburg and Bedford-Stuyvesant. 
After the crash, the corner was littered with a smashed up fence, a child’s kick scooter and a baby stroller. 
The NYPD could not confirm injuries, but Williamsburg News reported that two cars had collided, and one struck and injured a mother and her two kids were struck, with one in critical condition. 
One of the cars was a Fisker Ocean SUV with TLC plates  its record includes a red-light ticket earlier this year and a speeding ticket last year. 
“We should have more speed cameras and even more speed bumps to slow down drivers,” said Monie Love, home health aide in the neighborhood. 
“I mean, it’s a school zone so it’s for the safety of the children. 
And here’s this family hurt just on the sidewalk.” 
Sunday’s crash is just two blocks south of where a 9-year-old boy was struck and killed by a bus driver in May . 
Nostrand Avenue is a known danger strip because of several long blocks. 
Last year, there were 62 reported crashes just on the short stretch between Flushing and DeKalb avenues, according to city stats , injuring 30 people. 
Park Avenue is no safer. 
Over the same period, a similarly short stretch between Tompkins and Classon avenues was the site of 69 reported crashes, which injured 31 people, according to city statistics . 
Some residents of the community have previously opposed safety measures on the neighborhood’s streets. 
This is a breaking story and will be updated. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.4%Emily Lipstein: 7.3%Streetsblog NYC: 3.4%Confirmation Bias10.4%This article: 2.8%Emily Lipstein: 0.7%Streetsblog NYC: 0.8%Anchoring Bias2.8%This article: 25.9%Emily Lipstein: 18.8%Streetsblog NYC: 4.0%Availability Heuristic25.9%This article: 18.0%Emily Lipstein: 4.5%Streetsblog NYC: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic18.0%This article: 3.8%Emily Lipstein: 0.9%Streetsblog NYC: 0.3%Hindsight Bias3.8%This article: 7.6%Emily Lipstein: 1.9%Streetsblog NYC: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias7.6%This article: 3.8%Emily Lipstein: 4.1%Streetsblog NYC: 4.7%Framing Effect3.8%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.6%Emily Lipstein: 0.4%Streetsblog NYC: 0.7%Status Quo Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 4.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Emily Lipstein: 9.6%Streetsblog NYC: 6.7%Negativity Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Emily Lipstein: 1.1%Streetsblog NYC: 0.6%In-Group Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 4.4%Streetsblog NYC: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.3%Emily Lipstein: 3.6%Streetsblog NYC: 0.8%Recency Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.4%Emily Lipstein: 1.1%Streetsblog NYC: 2.4%Appeal to Authority4.4%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.8%Emily Lipstein: 8.0%Streetsblog NYC: 4.8%Hasty Generalization9.8%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.8%Emily Lipstein: 7.3%Streetsblog NYC: 3.2%Appeal to Emotion2.8%This article: 4.4%Emily Lipstein: 1.1%Streetsblog NYC: 0.8%Begging the Question4.4%This article: 16.1%Emily Lipstein: 4.0%Streetsblog NYC: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)16.1%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.4%Emily Lipstein: 2.6%Streetsblog NYC: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.4%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 1.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.8%Emily Lipstein: 5.4%Streetsblog NYC: 5.7%Biased Writer Voice3.8%This article: 7.6%Emily Lipstein: 3.8%Streetsblog NYC: 1.9%Indoctrination7.6%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lipstein: 0.0%Streetsblog NYC: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

317 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker15%attributed speech270writer words
Selected voice

Monie Love

100%flagged-word coverage
47 attributed words100% of attributed speech78% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Indoctrination+51.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Monie Love: 51.1%51.1%Biased Writer Voice-4.4 ptsWriter: 4.4%Monie Love: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.