Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Emily Lincke results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 103 faulty-reasoning hits from 916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 9,029 authors). This Emily Lincke is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Emily Lincke
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Tabitha Mueller1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Emily Lincke (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 916
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles916 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.2%5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos