Publication summary
10% 27 analyzed articles/videos 10,855 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Impact results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 3.3% saturation with 1,727 hits . Analysis detected 16,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 52,372 analyzed words across 27 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of 5% (539 of 564 publications). This Community Impact is better (less manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 52,372
Article count: 27
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.4% percentile 0.7% BS Score27 analyzed articles52.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst