Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Daniel Schwalm results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Negativity Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 38 faulty-reasoning hits from 590 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 8,975 authors). This Daniel Schwalm is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Daniel Schwalm
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Tabitha Mueller1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Daniel Schwalm (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 590
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles590 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos