Author summary
9% 1 analyzed article/video 398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katlynn Fox results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 84 hits . Analysis detected 436 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 41% (5,298 of 8,980 authors). This Katlynn Fox is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group. Katlynn Fox
Author details
Total words: 1,592
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.0% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.3% 5.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.3% 3.3% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst