New Caney ISD releases bell schedules for 2026-27 school year 4%

By Emily Lincke0%

7/31/2026, 4:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 3 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 103 faulty-reasoning hits from 229 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 11.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,514 of 28,475 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the article peer group.

All New Caney ISD students will be welcomed back to campuses Aug. 6, but the start of the school day will be different for elementary, middle and high school students, according to the district's website. 
In a nutshell 
The school day for NCISD elementary school students will run from 8:30 a.m.-3:55 p.m., according to NCISD’s website. 
Bell times include: 
Doors open: 7:45 a.m. 
Tardy bell: 8:30 a.m. 
School day ends: 3:55 p.m. 
For middle school students, the school day lasts 7 a.m.-2:25 p.m., and bell times include: 
Doors open: 6:30 a.m. 
Tardy bell: 7 a.m. 
School day ends: 2:25 p.m. 
For high school students, the school day runs 7:40 a.m.-3:20 p.m., and bell times include: 
Doors open: 7:15 a.m. 
Tardy bell: 7:40 a.m. 
School day ends: 3:20 p.m. 
The school day for students attending Infinity Early College High School lasts 7 a.m.-3 p.m., and bell times include: 
Doors open: 6:30 a.m. 
Tardy bell rings: 7 a.m. 
School day ends: 3 p.m. 
For the full middle and high school period schedules, click here. 
Before you go 
Returning student registration must be completed by Aug. 5 at 5 p.m., or the student will need to be enrolled via the enrollment process for new students, as previously reported by Community Impact. 
For more information on returning and new student registration, click here. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 1.0%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 1.9%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 14.4%Emily Lincke: 3.6%Community Impact: 0.7%Loss Aversion14.4%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.6%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 2.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 3.0%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 2.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 21.0%Emily Lincke: 5.2%Community Impact: 1.0%Appeal to Authority21.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 1.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 3.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 1.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Lincke: 0.0%Community Impact: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Emily Lincke: 2.4%Community Impact: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.6%

229 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker14%attributed speech196writer words
Selected voice

Community Impact

100%flagged-word coverage
33 attributed words100% of attributed speech36% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -11.2 ptsWriter: 11.2%Community Impact: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.