Author summary
30% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drew Johnson results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Loss Aversion , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 524 hits . Analysis detected 2,814 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,800 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 41% (5,311 of 8,993 authors). This Drew Johnson is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group. Drew Johnson
Author details
Total words: 4,800
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst