Hannaford recalls ground beef product sold at Farmington location 3%

By Drew Johnson30%

8/3/2026, 5:00:56 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Loss Aversion, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 74 faulty-reasoning hits from 116 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,878 of 28,471 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 97.90% of the article peer group.

Hannaford is recalling packages of its ground beef sold at a Farmington store over the weekend for potentially containing foreign material. 
The recall, announced on Monday, applies to packages of Hannaford brand 81% lean and 19% fat ground beef purchased at the store at 131 Hannaford Drive in Farmington on Saturday. 
The impacted universal product code numbers are 21129100000; 21128700000; and 21128800000 and have a “sell-by” date of Aug. 
2. 
No injuries or illnesses have been reported as of Monday, according to Hannaford, and the recall only applies to the Farmington store. 
Customers can return the product or its packaging to the store for a full refund. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 4.3%The Portland Press Herald: 2.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.0%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 2.2%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 2.2%The Portland Press Herald: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 3.2%The Portland Press Herald: 3.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 12.9%Drew Johnson: 3.7%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Loss Aversion12.9%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.8%The Portland Press Herald: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.9%The Portland Press Herald: 3.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.3%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 19.0%Drew Johnson: 3.6%The Portland Press Herald: 2.5%Negativity Bias19.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 3.5%The Portland Press Herald: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 1.4%The Portland Press Herald: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.5%The Portland Press Herald: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 1.8%The Portland Press Herald: 3.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 2.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.5%The Portland Press Herald: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 5.3%The Portland Press Herald: 2.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 1.1%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 1.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 10.9%The Portland Press Herald: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 1.1%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.4%The Portland Press Herald: 1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 1.1%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 1.4%The Portland Press Herald: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.5%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.5%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 1.2%The Portland Press Herald: 0.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.7%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 19.0%Drew Johnson: 1.4%The Portland Press Herald: 3.6%Biased Writer Voice19.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.9%The Portland Press Herald: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Drew Johnson: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 12.9%Drew Johnson: 0.3%The Portland Press Herald: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…12.9%

116 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker19%attributed speech94writer words
Selected voice

Hannaford

100%flagged-word coverage
22 attributed words100% of attributed speech16% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Hannaford: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -16.0 ptsWriter: 16.0%Hannaford: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.