Author summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos695 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Annisyn Krebs-Carr results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 830 hits. Analysis detected 4,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,316 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,476 of 6,204 authors). This Annisyn Krebs-Carr is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Annisyn Krebs-Carr
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
28%Annisyn Krebs-Carr (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,316
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

28% percentile
025507510027.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.2%8.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 11.3%11.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate