5 Killer Quotes From Alito's Takedown Of Hawaii's Illegal Gun Control Law 57%

By Shawn Fleetwood68%

6/25/2026, 7:01:01 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Begging the Question, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.4% saturation with 171 hits. Analysis detected 1,216 faulty-reasoning hits from 624 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54.1% and a BS Rank of 57% (9,463 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 56.80% of the article peer group.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is having quite the year. 
After authoring a major decision nuking race-based redistricting a few months ago, the senior justice just released a new ruling protecting Americans' Second Amendment rights. 
Writing for the 6-3 majority in Wolford v. 
Lopez, Alito and his fellow conservative justices found Hawaii's law restricting concealed-carry permit holders from carrying handguns on private property that's open to the public to be unconstitutional. 
The majority more specifically determined that this “vampire rule” unlawfully burdened Americans' Second and 14th Amendment rights. 
Like many of his opinions, Alito's Wolford decision contained everything one would expect from a strong, originalist justice. 
From its reliance on the Constitution's text and history to its overall practicality, here are the best lines from the court's ruling. 
A ‘New Burden’ on Permit Holders 
Alito noted how Hawaii's restriction imposes a “new burden” on permit holders by forcing them to acquire permission from the property owner or manager before entering the premises. 
Some proprietors who do not themselves object to entry by carry-permit holders may be reluctant to post a sign welcoming such individuals for fear of alienating other customers. 
So under Hawaii’s new default rule, a proprietor in this category may only be willing to consent discreetly to the entry of permit holders who make the effort to inquire. 
This arrangement imposes a new burden on permit holders who will have to somehow obtain permission to carry a firearm on the property before stepping foot on it. 
The Constitution Applies to All 
The Bush appointee underscored that Hawaii's history of “antipathy” to residents owning firearms is irrelevant because the Constitution applies equally to all states. 
[T]he Second Amendment has the same meaning in all parts of the United States. ... 
It cannot give way to “the spirit of Aloha” in Hawaii ... any more than it can yield to the spirit of the Big Apple (Bruen) or the Windy City (McDonald). 
It applies in the same way to our 50th State (where about 8% of adults possess guns) and our 49th State (where the figure is roughly 59%). 
Merely local attitudes can neither shrink nor inflate the meaning of fundamental Bill of Rights guarantees that apply to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. 
An American Tradition 
Alito highlighted how carrying firearms in public is a longstanding American tradition. 
[A]s we have explained, “overwhelming evidence” shows an “enduring American tradition permitting public carry.” ... 
Hawaii’s prohibitions on public carry represent a distinct outlier. 
Hawaii's Historical Analogues Don’t Work 
Alito detailed how Hawaii's reliance on founding-era gun restrictions to defend its unconstitutional law doesn't pass the smell test. 
In sum, the State’s analogues principally targeted unauthorized hunting. 
Their coverage differed sharply from that of the Hawaii law now before us. 
They applied to land where game could be found, not retail establishments that residents of cities and suburbs frequent as part of their daily routines. 
They had little if any impact on the Second Amendment’s central objective: protecting the fundamental right to self-defense. 
Black Codes Are a No-Go 
Alito blasted Hawaii for relying on a Civil War-era law (“Black Code”) aimed at restricting freed black Americans' Second Amendment rights to defend its concealed carry restriction. 
As we laid out in McDonald, the right to keep and bear arms was crucially important for vulnerable blacks during this period. ... 
And this was well-understood by the Republicans in Congress who were responsible for drafting, approving, and securing the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment. ... 
Unless we put history entirely out of our minds, Hawaii’s claim that this tainted artifact illuminates the original understanding of the right to keep and bear arms cannot be taken seriously. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.3%Shawn Fleetwood: 6.7%The Federalist: 8.5%Confirmation Bias16.3%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 3.3%The Federalist: 3.5%Availability Heuristic8.0%This article: 5.8%Shawn Fleetwood: 1.1%The Federalist: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic5.8%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.6%The Federalist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.9%The Federalist: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias2.4%This article: 16.2%Shawn Fleetwood: 11.9%The Federalist: 10.1%Framing Effect16.2%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.3%The Federalist: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.7%The Federalist: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 1.2%The Federalist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias5.0%This article: 12.8%Shawn Fleetwood: 10.1%The Federalist: 12.4%Negativity Bias12.8%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.6%The Federalist: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.6%The Federalist: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error3.7%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Shawn Fleetwood: 2.5%The Federalist: 3.9%In-Group Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.9%The Federalist: 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Shawn Fleetwood: 5.7%The Federalist: 2.2%Halo Effect5.8%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.6%Shawn Fleetwood: 1.6%The Federalist: 1.3%Recency Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Shawn Fleetwood: 3.6%The Federalist: 5.3%Ad Hominem4.3%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 2.1%The Federalist: 2.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 4.5%The Federalist: 5.0%Appeal to Authority9.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 1.4%The Federalist: 2.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 1.5%The Federalist: 2.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.4%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.7%Shawn Fleetwood: 8.3%The Federalist: 11.4%Hasty Generalization11.7%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.3%The Federalist: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.4%Shawn Fleetwood: 8.7%The Federalist: 8.2%Appeal to Emotion5.4%This article: 16.3%Shawn Fleetwood: 3.1%The Federalist: 3.1%Begging the Question16.3%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 1.5%The Federalist: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 1.4%The Federalist: 0.5%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.5%The Federalist: 1.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.5%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.5%This article: 4.3%Shawn Fleetwood: 1.3%The Federalist: 0.4%Composition/Division4.3%This article: 4.5%Shawn Fleetwood: 1.3%The Federalist: 2.8%Anecdotal4.5%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.1%Shawn Fleetwood: 1.4%The Federalist: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.1%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 3.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.2%Personal Incredulity3.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.8%The Federalist: 0.8%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.4%Shawn Fleetwood: 2.9%The Federalist: 3.1%Unattributed Quote2.4%This article: 6.4%Shawn Fleetwood: 2.1%The Federalist: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection6.4%This article: 27.4%Shawn Fleetwood: 18.3%The Federalist: 19.7%Biased Writer Voice27.4%This article: 2.9%Shawn Fleetwood: 2.2%The Federalist: 5.2%Indoctrination2.9%This article: 0.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Shawn Fleetwood: 19.0%The Federalist: 15.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias4.0%This article: 3.5%Shawn Fleetwood: 0.5%The Federalist: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.5%

624 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker44%attributed speech347writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageSamuel Alito • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageSamuel Alito • 15 words • 100.0% coverageSamuel Alito • 31 words • 0.0% coverageSamuel Alito • 27 words • 0.0% coverageSamuel Alito • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageSamuel Alito • 12 words • 0.0% coverageSamuel Alito • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageSamuel Alito • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageSamuel Alito • 27 words • 100.0% coverageSamuel Alito • 23 words • 0.0% coverageSamuel Alito • 24 words • 0.0% coverageSamuel Alito • 31 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Samuel Alito

86%flagged-word coverage
277 attributed words100% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Biased Writer Voice-11.6 ptsWriter: 32.6%Samuel Alito: 20.9%20.9%Quote-first Misdirection-11.5 ptsWriter: 11.5%Samuel Alito: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -7.2 ptsWriter: 7.2%Samuel Alito: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -6.3 ptsWriter: 6.3%Samuel Alito: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+5.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Samuel Alito: 5.4%5.4%Indoctrination-5.2 ptsWriter: 5.2%Samuel Alito: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.