Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,261 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vampire Rule results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 846 hits . Analysis detected 5,058 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,044 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,850 of 37,536 keywords). This Vampire Rule is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group. Vampire Rule
Keyword details
Total words: 5,044
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.8% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.8% 16.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst