Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,224 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zoos results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Representativeness Heuristic as the most egregious example at 4.3% saturation with 314 hits. Analysis detected 3,818 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,244 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (14,761 of 16,236 topics). This Zoos is better (less manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group.
Zoos
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

9% percentile
02550751009.1% percentile
1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos