Topic summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video1,378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zero Tolerance Policies results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 413 hits. Analysis detected 2,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,134 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,603 of 16,562 topics). This Zero Tolerance Policies is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Zero Tolerance Policies
Topic details
Total words: 4,134
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos