Topic summary
14%7 analyzed articles/videos9,860 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Youth Programs results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Optimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 1,863 hits. Analysis detected 21,114 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,765 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (15,059 of 15,558 topics). This Youth Programs is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

3% percentile
02550751003.2% percentile
1.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles35.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.8%4.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate