Topic summary
ā 94% 1 analyzed article/video 207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Youth Online Safety results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Biased Writer Voice , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 106 hits . Analysis detected 686 faulty-reasoning hits from 621 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ā 82% (3,139 of 16,562 topics). This Youth Online Safety is worse (more manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group. Youth Online Safety
Topic details
Total words: 621
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.1% percentile 5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles621 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 17.1% 17.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 11.9% 11.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Anecdotal: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.7%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.0% Composition/Division: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst