Topic summary
⁠15%1 analyzed article/video1,303 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yemen Civil War results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 256 hits. Analysis detected 1,690 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (17,660 of 21,033 topics). This Yemen Civil War is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
Yemen Civil War
Topic details
Total words: 5,212
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510016.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos