Topic summary
20% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,214 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yellowstone results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 1,482 hits . Analysis detected 6,292 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,974 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (13,400 of 16,562 topics). This Yellowstone is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group. Yellowstone
Topic details
Total words: 7,974
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 18.6% 18.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst