Topic summary
⁠40%3 analyzed articles/videos1,617 analyzed words
BS Summary: These X Men results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 2,278 hits. Analysis detected 9,503 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,760 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,089 of 16,243 topics). This X Men is worse (more manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
X Men
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,760
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.4% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.4%29.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.9%5.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos