Topic summary
⁠96%2 analyzed articles/videos1,513 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wrestling results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 36.5% saturation with 1,645 hits. Analysis detected 8,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,513 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,191 of 16,562 topics). This Wrestling is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Wrestling
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,513
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510074.7% percentile
4.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 36.5%36.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.3%14.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.5%25.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.7%5.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.5%22.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 10.6%10.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 36.5%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.5%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos