Topic summary
5% 3 analyzed articles/videos 592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Events results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 386 hits . Analysis detected 1,662 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,048 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 60% (6,417 of 15,988 topics). This World Events is worse (more manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group. World Events
Topic details
Total words: 2,048
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.9% percentile 3.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst