Topic summary
⁠11%2 analyzed articles/videos1,347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Cup Prize Money results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 464 hits. Analysis detected 2,815 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,550 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,708 of 16,562 topics). This World Cup Prize Money is better (less manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
World Cup Prize Money
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.4% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.2%10.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos