Author summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video838 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Graham Dunbar results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 234 hits. Analysis detected 1,552 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,514 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (2,806 of 6,215 authors). This Graham Dunbar is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Graham Dunbar
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠55%Graham Dunbar (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,514
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

55% percentile
025507510054.9% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.3%5.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.2%6.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.3%9.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos