Topic summary
0% 15 analyzed articles/videos 16,597 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Cup Kansas City results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 4,050 hits . Analysis detected 34,835 faulty-reasoning hits from 55,032 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (15,258 of 15,788 topics). This World Cup Kansas City is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group. World Cup Kansas City
Topic details
Total words: 55,032
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.4% percentile 1.3% BS Score15 analyzed articles55K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst