Topic summary
16% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,710 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Cup Final results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 1,528 hits . Analysis detected 7,530 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,672 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (11,580 of 15,689 topics). This World Cup Final is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group. World Cup Final
Topic details
Total words: 9,672
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 15.8% 15.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst