Author summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Michael Duarte results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hindsight Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 208 hits . Analysis detected 888 faulty-reasoning hits from 796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Michael Duarte is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Michael Duarte
Author details
Total words: 796
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles796 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 26.1% 26.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 17.3% 17.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Fundamental Attribution E⦠Sitewide 2.7% Author 6.8% 6.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 17.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.8%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Composition/Division: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.6% Special Pleading: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst