Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Michael Duarte results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hindsight Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 208 hits. Analysis detected 888 faulty-reasoning hits from 796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Michael Duarte is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Michael Duarte
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Michael Duarte (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 796
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles796 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 26.1%26.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 17.3%17.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 6.8%6.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Author 17.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Composition/Division: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.6%Special Pleading: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos