Topic summary
⁠98%2 analyzed articles/videos974 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Workforce Shortages results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Indoctrination, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 465 hits. Analysis detected 4,247 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,922 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,622 of 16,562 topics). This Workforce Shortages is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Workforce Shortages
Topic details
Total words: 2,922
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.1% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.9%9.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.3%8.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.8%11.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos