Topic summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Worker's Compensation results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 669 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,125 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,368 of 15,651 topics). This Worker's Compensation is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Worker's Compensation
Topic details
Total words: 1,125
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.3% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.6%5.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos