Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Celina Aalders results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 696 hits. Analysis detected 3,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Celina Aalders is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Celina Aalders
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Celina Aalders (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 6,980
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.1%2.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos