Topic summary
77% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,837 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Worker Safety results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 759 hits . Analysis detected 5,723 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,511 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 52% (7,983 of 16,558 topics). This Worker Safety is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group. Worker Safety
Topic details
Total words: 5,511
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.8% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.1% 9.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst