Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,647 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Work Ethic results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 1,597 hits. Analysis detected 11,804 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,588 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,611 of 16,092 topics). This Work Ethic is better (less manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Work Ethic
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,588
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510034.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.1%15.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos