Topic summary
⁠79%2 analyzed articles/videos196 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Women's Issues results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 47.4% saturation with 332 hits. Analysis detected 1,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 700 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (433 of 16,562 topics). This Women's Issues is worse (more manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group.
Women's Issues
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 700
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

97% percentile
025507510097.4% percentile
16.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles700 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 39.9%39.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 47.4%47.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 28.9%28.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 16.3%16.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 16.3%16.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 14.4%14.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 29.7%29.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 14.6%14.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 47.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 39.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 29.7%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Topic 28.9%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos