Author summary
44% 4 analyzed articles/videos 240 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mai Yoshikawa results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 258 hits . Analysis detected 1,428 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,240 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,190 of 6,628 authors). This Mai Yoshikawa is worse (more manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group. Mai Yoshikawa
Author details
Total words: 1,240
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.1% percentile 4.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.8% 8.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.3% 3.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 6.0% 6.0% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 14.5%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.6% Horn Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.0% Primacy Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst