Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Women In Business results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 1,032 hits. Analysis detected 6,395 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,586 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,503 of 16,562 topics). This Women In Business is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Women In Business
Topic details
Total words: 4,586
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.8% percentile
4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 22.5%22.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 7.2%7.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.5%8.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.7%9.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos